Select your language

logo br en 1

A.M. Gorky Institute
of World Literature
of the Russian Academy of Sciences

IWL RAS Publishing

A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature
of the Russian Academy of Sciences

 IWL RAS

Povarskaya 25a, 121069 Moscow, Russia

8-495-690-05-61

edition@imli.ru

iwl.ras.publishing@gmail.com

Sections

Types of publications

  • Classification – name: Literary studies
  • Author: Valery I. Tiupa
  • Pages: 21–30
  • Publisher: A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IWL RAS Publ.)
  • Rights – description: Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 (СС BY-ND)
  • Rights – URL: Visit Website
  • Language of the publication: Russian
  • Type of document: Research Article
  • Collection: Mikhail Prishvin’s Literary Heritage: The Context of National and World Culture
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.22455/978-5-9208-0780-9-21-30
  • EDN:

    https://elibrary.ru/MJCLQN

  • Year of publication: 2024
  • Place of publication: Moscow
  • PDF

  • Tiupa, V.I. “Prishvinʼs Contribution to Literary Theory.” Literaturnoe nasledie Mikhaila Prishvina: kontekst otechestvennoi i mirovoi kul’tury [Mikhail Prishvin’s Literary Heritage: The Context of National and World Culture], ed.-comp. Elena Yu. Кnorre, Anastasia G. Gacheva. Moscow, IWL RAS Publ., 2024, pp. 21–30. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22455/978-5-9208-0780-9-21-30

Information about the author:

Valery I. Tiupa, DSc in Philology, Professor, Russian State University for the Humanities, Miusskaya Sq., 6, 125047 Moscow, Russia.

ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1688-2787

E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. 

Abstract:

This paper examines Prishvin’s creative reflection, captured in some of his lyrical miniatures. The writer’s insights have not lost their fundamental importance for the modern theory of literature, which became an independent scientific discipline in the 20th century. During this formative period, it split into aesthetic and rhetorical branches. Prishvin thought about the art of speech in aesthetic terms and, in this respect, largely coincided with the “aesthetics of verbal art” of Mikhail Bakhtin, which opposed the rhetorical nature of literary criticism of the Russian “formal” school. Far from being scholarly, Prishvinʼs reflections were no less profound than Bakhtinʼs philosophical constructions, capturing the specificity of the creative integrity and completeness of literary works, the specificity of the creative act itself realized through “order in the soul,” and the specificity of the recipientʼs positioning by the artistic text.

  • Keywords: Prishvin, creative reflection, aesthetics, theory of literature.

Search

Find book in the current section