Information about the author:
Olga I. Polovinkina
Olga I. Polovinkina, DSc in Philology, Head of the Department, State University for the Humanities, Miusskaya Sq. 6, 125993 Moscow, Russia; Senior Researcher, A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Povarskaya 25 a, 121069 Moscow, Russia.
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4135-8861
E-mail:
Abstract:
The article explores neoclassical tendencies in Anglo-American Modernist aesthe- tics and poetry in relation to the utopia of China, its history being traced from the 18th up to the 20th century. Debates with advocates of the romantic idea of poetry are considered to be the cru- cial factor for the “new classical spirit” in Modernist poetry to assert itself. T.E. Hulme’s ideas of Classicism are analysed as formulated in dialogue with Ch. Maurras, A. Bergson, W. Pater, J.M. Kennedy, M. Denis and R. Fry. The main Classicist principle of Modernist aesthetics is defined as imitation of models, and E. Pound saw Chinese poetry as such model. He proclaimed “The Chinese Written Character” by E. Fenollosa a new “Art of Poetry.” The idea of China replacing classical Antiquity dates back to the British 18th century. The article reconstructs the history of the perception of Chinese culture by the “Augustinians”, who borrowed the aesthetic principle of “beauty without order” in Chinese landscape architecture; it shows the origins, essence, and fate of the fantasy about China that emerged in the British cultural imagination. Historically, a new type of Classicism at the beginning of the 20th century appeals to the poetry of the “Augustinian Age” with its characteristic conjugation of aesthetic norm and subjectivity.
Keywords: T.E. Hulme, E. Pound, E. Fenollosa, W. Temple, J. Addison, A. Pope, Neoclassicism.

